Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id b998a672-2525-1cba-ac64-b292f495919e@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/27/20 8:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Great. I do want to do a bit more desultory testing in the older
>> versions of the docs, but it can be committed whenever the -docs side is
>> ready.
>
> Other than that point, the main.css patch as I presented it just adds
> some rules that aren't used yet, so it could be pushed as soon as you're
> satisfied about the !important change.  It'd probably make sense to
> push it in advance of making the markup changes, so we don't have an
> interval of near-unreadable devel docs.

*nods* I'll ensure to test again and hopefully commit later today.

I forget what I was looking at, but I did see a similar pattern in some
other modern software docs, so it seems like this is trending in the
right direction. Looking forward to the rollout!

Jonathan


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Next
From: Prabhat Sahu
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables