Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 4/20/17 22:24, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:09:54PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think we're not really sure yet what to do about this.  Discussion is
>> ongoing.  I'll report back on Wednesday.
> 
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update, and this is
> overall the seventh time you have you allowed one of your open items to go out
> of compliance.  Kindly start complying with the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

We are actively working on it.  It should be resolved within a few days.Next check-in Monday.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services