Re: postgres 8 settings - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mike Rylander
Subject Re: postgres 8 settings
Date
Msg-id b918cf3d050310051448e0a103@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgres 8 settings  ("vinita bansal" <sagivini@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgres 8 settings
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:58:02 +0000, vinita bansal <sagivini@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 64 bit Opteron m/c with 32GB RAM and ~500GB HardDrive. The database
> size is ~45GB.
>

I've got a similar box, but with only 16G RAM.  What is the storage
subsystem, fibre channel or SCSI?  Also, what OS?

> I am using the following values in postgresql.conf:
>
> shared_buffers = 100000

Seems high.  I did some testing with my real data and found that
anything of 15000 wasn't really gaining my anything.  This is an 8.x
config file (maintenance_work_mem vs. sort_mem), and pg 8+ can
actually make do with smaller shared_buffers because of the ARC (soon
to be 2Q) buffer management algorithm.  Unless your working set PER
QUERY is enormous I would suggest lowering this.

> work_mem = 128000

That's fine, but you may need to bump it up if (as above) you have
individual queries that sort/group huge rowsets.

> maintenance_work_mem = 100000

Remember to pump this way up when building very large indexes.

> max_fsm_pages = 200000

Should probably be bigger.  Mine is 2000000 (2 million).

> bgwriter_percent = 0
> bgwriter_maxpages = 0
> fsync = false

*KLAXON SOUNDS*  Unless you dislike having your data around after
power/hardware anomalies you'd better turn that on!

> wal_buffers = 1000
> checkpoint_segments = 2048

This will require 16 * ((2 * 1000)  + 1) MB of drive space... 100
should be fine, really.  (next setting related)

> checkpoint_timeout = 3600

Conventional wisdom is not to set this higher than 1800.  It also
means that you can cut your checkpoint_segments in half (more or
less).

> effective_cache_size = 1840000
> random_page_cost = 2

This might be low, but it depends on your storage subsystem.  Is it
fibre channel?

> geqo_threshold = 25

Wide queries, eh?

> geqo_effort = 1
> stats_start_collector = false
> stats_command_string = false
>

If you want to use pg_autovacuum then you will need to turn the stats
stuff back on, including row statistics.  Plus it's a big help in
debugging.

> Do these settings seem fine or I am making some mistake. These settings when
> used with Postgres 7.4 gave me good results but they don't seem to work with
> Postgres 8.0. Am I missing out on something??
>
> Regards,
> Vinita Bansal
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Click, Upload, Print. http://www.kodakexpress.co.in?soe=4956 Deliver in
> India.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
>


--
Mike Rylander
mrylander@gmail.com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shaun Clements
Date:
Subject: Re: pl sql to check if table of table_name exists
Next
From: marcelo Cortez
Date:
Subject: postgres db failure