On 7/1/19 5:20 PM, Alexey Kondratov wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 01.07.2019 15:02, Thomas Munro wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> This no longer applies. Since the Commitfest is starting now, could
>> you please rebase it?
>
> Thank you for a reminder. Rebased version of the patch is attached.
> I've also modified my logging code in order to obey new unified
> logging system for command-line programs commited by Peter (cc8d415117).
>
>
> Regards
>
Hi Alexey,
I would like to suggest a couple of changes to docs and comments, please
see the attachment.
The "...or fetched on startup" part also seems wrong here, but it's not
a part of your patch, so I'm going to ask about it on psql-docs separately.
It might also be useful to reword the following error messages:
- "using restored from archive version of file \"%s\""
- "could not open restored from archive file \"%s\"
We could probably say something like "could not open file \"%s\"
restored from WAL archive" instead.
On a more general note, I wonder if everyone is happy with the
--using-postgresql-conf option name, or we should continue searching for
a narrower term. Unfortunately, I don't have any better suggestions
right now, but I believe it should be clear that its purpose is to fetch
missing WAL files for target. What do you think?
--
Liudmila Mantrova
Technical writer at Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
