Re: Rangejoin rebased - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Kuzmenkov
Subject Re: Rangejoin rebased
Date
Msg-id b78f5c6c-e7c5-b3a3-d56a-778f33c0b277@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rangejoin rebased  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Rangejoin rebased  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16.01.2018 10:49, Jeff Davis wrote:
> My proposed fix is to make an internal opfamily identical to the
> external one, such that it's not recognized as part of the same EC,
> and the planner won't try to eliminate it. It loses out on potential
> optimizations, but those are mostly theoretical since the btree
> opclass ordering for ranges is not very interesting to a user.
I think I figured out what to do with missing sort directions. We can 
change select_outer_pathkeys_for_merge() to generate the pathkeys we 
need. Also, find_mergeclauses_for_outer_pathkeys() has to be changed 
too, so that it knows which pathkeys are compatible to which range join 
clauses.

About the patch, do I understand it right that you are working on the 
next version now?

-- 
Alexander Kuzmenkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSOC 18] Performance Farm Project
Next
From: Nikolay Shaplov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters