On 10/2/21 11:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 10/2/21 5:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> IIUC, the only problem for a non-updated animal would be that it'd
>>> run the test twice? Or would it actually fail? If the latter,
>>> we'd need to sit on the patch rather longer.
>> The patch removes test.sh, so yes it would break.
> Maybe we could leave test.sh in place for awhile? I'd rather
> not cause a flag day for buildfarm owners. (Also, how do we
> see this working in the back branches?)
>
>
Actually, I was wrong. The module just does "make check" for non-MSVC.
For MSVC it calls vcregress.pl, which the patch doesn't touch (it
should, I think).
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com