Re: [HACKERS] simplify sequence test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] simplify sequence test
Date
Msg-id b5ba00c2-0362-f2ff-eec5-87c0a5f30d48@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] simplify sequence test  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/25/17 5:29 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 25/01/17 03:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> We maintain a separate test output file sequence_1.out because the
>> log_cnt value can vary if there is a checkpoint happening at the right
>> time.  So we have to maintain two files because of a one character
>> difference.  I propose the attached patch to restructure the test a bit
>> to avoid this, without loss of test coverage.
>>
> 
> +1, looks good.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Allow interrupts on waiting standby