Re: [HACKERS] simplify sequence test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: [HACKERS] simplify sequence test
Date
Msg-id 3cfc280d-0c19-8be9-9db3-a19b6974dce0@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] simplify sequence test  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] simplify sequence test  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 25/01/17 03:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We maintain a separate test output file sequence_1.out because the
> log_cnt value can vary if there is a checkpoint happening at the right
> time.  So we have to maintain two files because of a one character
> difference.  I propose the attached patch to restructure the test a bit
> to avoid this, without loss of test coverage.
> 

+1, looks good.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench more operators & functions
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Assignment of valid collation for SET operations onqueries with UNKNOWN types.