Hi Michael,
On 12/12/17 6:08 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>> If the forks are written out of order (i.e. main before init), which is
>> definitely possible, then I think worst case is some files will be backed up
>> that don't need to be. The main fork is unlikely to be very large at that
>> point so it doesn't seem like a big deal.
>
> As far as I recall the init forks are logged before the main forks. I
> don't think that we should rely on that assumption though to be always
> satisfied.
Indeed, nothing is sure until a checkpoint. Until then we must assume
writes are random.
>> Well, I would be happy if you had a look!
>
> You can count me in. I think that this patch has value for some
> dedicated workloads.
Thanks!
> It is a waste to backup stuff that will be
> removed at recovery anyway.
It also causes confusion when the recovered database is smaller than the
backup. I can't tell you how many times I have answered this question...
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
