On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 03:46 +0000, Iain Barnett wrote:
>
>> CREATE TYPE inventory_item2 AS (
>> name text,
>> supplier_id integer,
>> price numeric,
>> size integer
>> );
>>
>>
>> but it would be handy if I could reuse inventory_item instead of
>> having to retype the whole lot. I can't work out or find the right
>> syntax, can anyone show me how? Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> What about:
>
> CREATE TYPE inventory_item2 AS (
> ii inventory_item,
> size integer
> );
>
> or:
>
> CREATE TABLE inventory_item2 (
> LIKE inventory_item,
> size integer
> );
Pretty neat. I wasn't aware you could mix LIKE with explicit field
declarations.
Those expressions produce different results...the first creates a type
within a type (nested) and the second creates a new unnested type
based on the fields of the original type. The first expression
creates a dependency while the second does not. This flexibility is
only possible if you create types with the 'create table' statement.
merlin
