On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I'm planning to work on typed tables support. The idea is that you
> create a table out of a composite type (as opposed to the other way
> around, which is currently done automatically).
>
> CREATE TYPE persons_type AS (name text, bdate date);
>
> CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type;
>
> Or the fancy version:
>
> CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type ( PRIMARY KEY (name) );
I use composite types (via tables) all the time but I never use
'create type as'...because by doing so you lose the ability to alter
the type with 'alter table'.
Am I correct that I could use your idea to make this possible (albeit
quite ugly) by:
create type foo(a text, b text);
create table foo of foo;
alter table foo add column c text;
drop table foo; -- does this drop the type as well??
merlin
