On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> Any change here is *not* a bug fix, it is a change of clearly
>> documented and not-obviously-unreasonable behavior. We have to take
>> seriously the likelihood that it will break existing code.
>
> Perhaps plpgsql could support tests of SQLSTATE, and recognize '02000'
> (the standard value for "zero rows affected") to support the desired
> new semantics?
+1
I rarely use found because it's dangerous ...would be nice to have a
more rigorous test...
merlin
