Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support
Date
Msg-id b42b73150610201204u373d0690k62545db46db9d282@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support  ("Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/20/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So far I've seen no evidence that async I/O would help us, only a lot
> of wishful thinking.

is this thread moot?  while researching this thread I came across this
article: http://kerneltrap.org/node/6642 describing claims of 30%
performance boost when using posix_fadvise to ask the o/s to prefetch
data.  istm that this kind of improvement is in line with what aio can
provide, and posix_fadvise is cleaner, not requiring threads and such.

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: Asynchronous I/O Support