On 9/22/06, Jim C. Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:
> This is why I suggested we set aside some range of numbers that should
> not be used. Doing so would allow adding a better-managed
> numbering/naming scheme in the future.
the whole point about advisory locks is that the provided lock space
is unmanaged. for example, in the ISAM system I wrote which hooked
into the acucobol virtual file system interface, I used a global
sequence for row level pessimistic locking but reserved the 48th bit
for table level locks. This system was extremely effective. on the
current system I'm working on I use them to lock sequence oid's plus a
high bit indicator for what i am doing. in short, advisory locks are
application-defined in concept.
merlin
