Re: alternative to using a sequence - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: alternative to using a sequence
Date
Msg-id b42b73150608260807s7730644fj5c9f1bcfeb1a0101@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to alternative to using a sequence  (snacktime <snacktime@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 8/26/06, snacktime <snacktime@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have an application that processes financial transactions.  Each of
> these transactions needs to be sent with a sequence number.  It starts
> at 1 and resets to 1 once it hits 8000.   I'm trying to think of the
> most elegant solution without having to create a sequence for each
> user (there are hundreds).  There is a table that holds the
> configuration parameters for each merchant, so a field in that table
> to hold the sequence number would be ideal.  In the past I've used
> sequences as well as just a field which I query then update.  Any
> other ideas?

How many sequences are we talking about?

merlin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Purusothaman A"
Date:
Subject: Win2000 professional / Error message while installing PostgreSQL "Failed to create process: 2! ".
Next
From: "Jasbinder Bali"
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared Objects (Dynamic loading)