Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikael Kjellström
Subject Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
Date
Msg-id b3b801a2-cc63-7f7f-533e-36c2870373cc@mksoft.nu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2021-10-08 18:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu> writes:
>> Yes, it's getting long in the tooth.  I will upgrade the NetBSD 7
>> (sidewinder) to 9.2.
>> And I will also upgrade loach to 12.x if that's the version that is
>> needed the most.
>> I will upgrade conchuela to DragonFlyBSD 6.0.
>> I will remove the 5.9 (curculio) and upgrade the 6.5 (morepork) to 6.9.
> 
> +1 to all of that except retiring curculio.  That one has shown us issues
> we've not seen on other animals (recent examples at [1][2]), so unless
> you're feeling resource-constrained I'd vote for keeping it going.

Sure I can keep curculio as is.  Will just upgrade morepork to OpenBSD 
6.9 then.

/Mikael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function?