Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
Date
Msg-id 235162.1633709563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?  (Mikael Kjellström <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu>)
Responses Re: Time to upgrade buildfarm coverage for some EOL'd OSes?
List pgsql-hackers
=?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael.kjellstrom@mksoft.nu> writes:
> Yes, it's getting long in the tooth.  I will upgrade the NetBSD 7
> (sidewinder) to 9.2.
> And I will also upgrade loach to 12.x if that's the version that is
> needed the most.
> I will upgrade conchuela to DragonFlyBSD 6.0.
> I will remove the 5.9 (curculio) and upgrade the 6.5 (morepork) to 6.9.

+1 to all of that except retiring curculio.  That one has shown us issues
we've not seen on other animals (recent examples at [1][2]), so unless
you're feeling resource-constrained I'd vote for keeping it going.

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YPAdf9r5aJbDoHoq@paquier.xyz
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1+uW1UGDHDz-HWMHMen76mKP7NJebOTZN4uwbyMjaYVww@mail.gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Adjust configure to insist on Perl version >= 5.8.3.
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests