Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id b2d46ab4-62f9-4d54-98cf-cf4f05cbe2f0@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016/09/09 18:47, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> A related change is renaming RangeBound structure in Amit
> Langote's patches to PartitionRangeBound to avoid name conflict with
> rangetypes.h. That change too should vanish once we decide where to keep
> that structure and its final name.

This change has been incorporated into the latest patch I posted on Sep 9 [1].

Thanks,
Amit

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28ee345c-1278-700e-39a7-36a71f9a3b43@lab.ntt.co.jp





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw