Re: Do we want a hashset type? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Do we want a hashset type?
Date
Msg-id b2c15c63-282b-10ca-1268-3ccd2db83567@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we want a hashset type?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 2023-06-14 We 05:44, Tomas Vondra wrote:

The thing is, adding stuff to core is not free - it means the community
becomes responsible for maintenance, testing, fixing issues, etc. It's
not feasible (or desirable) to have all extensions in core, and cloud
vendors generally do have ways to support some pre-vetted extensions
that they deem useful enough. Granted, it means vetting/maintenance for
them, but that's kinda the point of managed services. And it'd not be
free for us either.


I agree it's a judgement call. But the code burden here seems pretty small, far smaller than, say, the SQL/JSON patches. And I think the range of applications that could benefit is quite significant.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Replace (GUC_UNIT_MEMORY | GUC_UNIT_TIME) with GUC_UNIT in guc.c
Next
From: "Tristan Partin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use COPY for populating all pgbench tables