Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id b1f89d14-cd7f-e43d-964e-9fb04e209b72@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 4/29/20 11:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Clearly I was caught doing a single browser test (Chrome).
>
> Well, I've not tested anything but Safari, either ...
>
>> Reverted back to the verbose way sans !important, attached, which
>> appears to be the consensus. If you can ACK this, I'll commit.
>
> This one works for me.

Pushed. Thanks!

Jonathan
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Can we remove the other_rels_list parameter for make_rels_by_clause_joins
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector