Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id 20585.1588217180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
> Clearly I was caught doing a single browser test (Chrome).

Well, I've not tested anything but Safari, either ...

> Reverted back to the verbose way sans !important, attached, which
> appears to be the consensus. If you can ACK this, I'll commit.

This one works for me.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Bug with subqueries in recursive CTEs?
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with subqueries in recursive CTEs?