Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity
Date
Msg-id b0da4cc6-be57-ddaf-f762-ac4455569417@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity  (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>)
Responses Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity  (Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com>)
Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity  (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 4/19/19 11:14 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> 
>> If it is working for you now I see no reason to switch.
> 
> Adrian,
> 
> It does work. I just learned about the SQL identity type and want to learn
> when it's most appropriate to use. The databases I develop all work with
> integers as primary keys and reading about the type didn't clarify (for me)
> when it should be used.

Mainly for folks that want cross database SQL compliance. It is not a 
type so much as a way of specifying an auto-increment column.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rich Shepard
Date:
Subject: Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity
Next
From: Ken Tanzer
Date:
Subject: Re: Primary key data type: integer vs identity