On 8/20/23 22:31, Rihad wrote: > On 8/21/23 00:15, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 8/20/23 12:10, Rihad wrote: >>> On 8/20/23 20:22, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>>> On 8/18/23 22:35, Rihad wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/23 13:01, rihad wrote: >>>>>> >> >> Hard to say without seeing the actual settings in postgresql.conf that >> match: >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-autovacuum.html#GUC-AUTOVACUUM-VACUUM-SCALE-FACTOR >> >> >> Most importantly: >> >> autovacuum >> >> and >> >> track_counts >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-statistics.html#GUC-TRACK-COUNTS >> > > They are both on and set as per default. Autovac/analyze continue > running on some tables after pg_stat_reset. Just not on all of them, > even thought they should judging by live/dead tuples calculation. > > > foo=> show track_counts; > track_counts > -------------- > on > (1 row) > > foo=> show autovacuum; > autovacuum > ------------ > on > (1 row) How about the rest of the settings at?: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-autovacuum.html Have the storage parameters for the tables been changed per?: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createtable.html#SQL-CREATETABLE-STORAGE-PARAMETERS In psql you can do: \d+ <table_name> The setting if changed will show up as Options: <setting> Also are there include directives in use per?: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/config-setting.html#CONFIG-INCLUDES You can see by looking at the sourcefile field in pg_settings: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/view-pg-settings.html > > >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> There are still many tables waiting for their turn, which is long due. >>>>> >>>>> Although there are some tables having only 60-70 (not 60-70K) >>>>> n_live_tup that have had autovacuum run on them. Weird. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных