Re: Expected accuracy of planner statistics - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Arturo Perez
Subject Re: Expected accuracy of planner statistics
Date
Msg-id aperez-F6E8D6.07472029092006@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Expected accuracy of planner statistics  (Casey Duncan <casey@pandora.com>)
Responses Re: Expected accuracy of planner statistics
List pgsql-general
In article <20060929010011.GQ34238@nasby.net>,
 jim@nasby.net ("Jim C. Nasby") wrote:

> The problem is that you can't actually get
> a good n_distinct estimate if you're sampling less than a very large
> chunk of the table. Since our sampling maxes out at something like 30k
> pages, at some point the n_distinct estimates just degrade. :(

Can the DBA just set n_distinct?  Sometimes s/he just knows what the
value should be.

Then, of course, the questions becomes how to keep vacuum et al from
messing it up.

-arturo

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.4 on Vista RC1
Next
From: Jorge Godoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Expected accuracy of planner statistics