On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Jeremy Finzel wrote:
> Another suggestion which hasn’t been mentioned is using ‘infinity’ as the
> end date. I like this because it IMO indicates that the record is clearly
> the current valid record more than null.
Jeremy,
I believe that infinity was mentioned in this thread.
> But I’m not sure exactly what you are trying to do either. If you are
> creating a new record with changes and closing (ending) the range of the
> original record, then a GIST exclusion index would ensure you have no
> overlapping date ranges for all historical records put together.
Having overlapping date ranges in a projects table is a Good Thing(TM)
because it means I have multiple, concurrent revenue streams. :-)
Carpe weekend,
Rich
--
I dream of an America where a chicken can cross the road without having its
motives questioned.
