Hello Dean,
> Pushed.
>
> I decided not to go with the "joke" randu64() function, but instead
> used getrand() directly. This at least removes any *direct* use of
> doubles in permute() (though of course they're still used indirectly),
> and means that if getrand() is improved in the future, permute() will
> benefit too.
Good idea, at least it is hidden and in one place.
Thanks for the push!
--
Fabien.
