Hello David,
>>> I'd prefer not to expand the use of pqexpbuffer in more places, and
>>> instead rather see this use StringInfo, now that's also available to
>>> frontend programs.
>>
>> Franckly, one or the other does not matter much to me.
>
> FWIW, I agree with Andres with regard to using StringInfo.
Ok. I find it strange to mix PQExpBuffer & StringInfo in the same file.
> Also, the changes to executeStatementExpect() and adding executeStatement()
> do not seem to fit in with the purpose of this patch.
Yep, that was in passing.
Attached a v6 which uses StringInfo, and the small refactoring as a
separate patch.
--
Fabien.
