Hello Ildar,
>> Hmm. I do not think that we should want a shared seed value. The seed
>> should be different for each call so as to avoid undesired
>> correlations. If wanted, correlation could be obtained by using an
>> explicit identical seed.
>
> Probably I'm missing something but I cannot see the point. If we change
> seed on every invokation then we get uniform-like distribution (see
> attached image). And we don't get the same hash value for the same input
> which is the whole point of hash functions. Maybe I didn't understand
> you correctly.
I suggest to fix the seed when parsing the script, so that it is the same
seed on each script for a given pgbench invocation, so that for one run it
runs with the same seed for each hash call, but changes if pgbench is
re-invoked so that the results would be different.
Also, if hash(:i) and hash(:j) appears in two distinct scripts, ISTM that
we do not necessarily want the same seed, otherwise i == j would correlate
to hash(i) == hash(j), which may not be a desirable property for some use
case.
Maybe it would be desirable for other use cases, though.
> Anyway I've attached a new version with some tests and docs added.
--
Fabien.
