Hello,
>> I think that you could use another pattern where you init the
>> PQExpBufferData structure instead of create it, so that only the string is
>> malloced.
>
> In v26, I have the functions return PQExpBuffer. The two calling functions
> then free it, which should solve any leak.
Yep, it works as well.
> Here's an addendum that does that. I can combine them in v27, but figured
> this was quicker.
It works.
However having just one full patch with a number would help so that I can
say "ready to committer" or not on something.
--
Fabien.
