Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1703030845410.15047@lancre
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)
List pgsql-hackers
About v21:

Patch applies with some offset, make check ok, psql tap tests ok.

I also did some interactive tests which behaved as I was expecting.

I'm ok with this patch. I think that the very simple automaton code 
structure achieved is worth the very few code duplications. It is also 
significantly shorter than the nested if/switch variants, and it does 
exactly what Tom and Robert wished with respect to errors, so I think that 
this is a good compromise.

A tiny detail about "default". I would have added a comment when it is 
expected to be dead code (else, elif), and I would have put the list of 
matching states explicitely otherwise (if, endif) otherwise the reader has 
to remember what the other states are. Probably it is me being really too 
peckish, if at all possible:-)

I've turned the patch as ready, again.

-- 
Fabien.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] [BUG FIX] Removing NamedLWLockTrancheArray
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUG FIX] Removing NamedLWLockTrancheArray