> My first use of 9.3beta1 in development failed because of changes
> introduced by this patch, specifically because of the newly introduced error
>
> psql: -1 is incompatible with -c and -l
>
> I'm not convinced this is correct. -c and -l are single-transaction
> actions almost by definition.
>
> This particular aspect of the change wasn't really brought up in the
> original thread. What was your thinking?
AFAICR, the 3 lines patch I submitted did not include such a check.
Comments by Robert in the source suggest that the -1 option is ignored
under -c and -l. This is because the "transaction" is handled by
process_file which is not called in these cases.
However, if they are single transaction nevertheless, the guard may just
be removed, even if the option does nothing?
ISTM that option -l is readonly, it does not matter much. For -c, I'm not
that sure.
--
Fabien.
