On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Scott Carey wrote:
> For what it is worth, you can roughly double to triple the iops of an Intel X-25M on pure random reads if you queue
up
> multiple concurrent reads rather than serialize them. But it is not due to spindles, it is due to the latency of the
> SATA interface and the ability of the controller chip to issue reads to flash devices on different banks concurrently
> to some extent.
Spindles, banks. What's the difference? The fact is that you have multiple
"things", and queuing up requests in the controller means that more than
one at a time can be active. The X-25M is basically a RAID controller in
its own right, connected to ten flash devices.
Matthew
--
Don't worry! The world can't end today because it's already tomorrow
in Australia.
