On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> It's not clear to me why the JDBC-driver for PG shouldn't just use
> rs.getString() internally for getClob() calls? Requiring
> special-handling in Hibernate for dealing with Strings by setting an
> obscure property just doesn't seem right. And I don't want to set a
> property to handle CLOB which might affect how I use BLOBs.
>
The problem is that we have no idea what someone might want to do with a
CLOB after they've fetched it. You're coming from the idea that all they
want to do is read it and copy the data out to a String. From that
perspective it's not hard to have a Clob wrapper around a String, but what
happens when they say clob.setString(13, "data")? Are we going to try and
figure out what row of what table that varchar column is coming from and
do a partial update on it?
Kris Jurka
