On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Thor Michael St?re wrote:
> Also, I see SPECIFIC_NAME was added to JDBC 4, so I imagine that to
> correctly add it one would override getProcedures and
> getProcedureColumns in
> org.postgresql.jdbc4.AbstractJdbc4DatabaseMetaData and have them return
> the additional column(s). I took a look at the code and it seem straight
> forward enough for getProcedures, but getProcedureColumns has six other
> new columns as well and seems a bit hairier so I'm not sure if should
> throw myself over adding this.
>
I've checked in a fix for this to CVS so that getProcedures and
getProcedureColumns have all of the columns defined in JDBC4 including
SPECIFIC_NAME.
Kris Jurka
