On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Saneesh Apte wrote:
> One is minor: the base type of a boolean[] is java.sql.Types.BIT
> instead or java.sql.Types.BOOLEAN. At the very least shouldn't these be
> aliases for the same type?
These are aliases for the same type. I believe we accept either BOOLEAN
or BIT as equivalent in all cases. We default to BIT for historical
reasons because it was defined first in the JDBC2 spec while BOOLEAN came
around in the JDBC3 version.
> And secondly the returned type from a smallint[] is an Integer[]
> instead of a Short[].
>
The JDBC spec says that the result of getObject on a Types.SMALLINT value
should return Integer, so we have followed that for array types as well.
The spec contains this historical note:
The JDBC 1.0 specification defined the Java object mapping for the
SMALLINT and TINYINT JDBC types to be Integer. The Java language
did not include the Byte and Short data types when the JDBC 1.0
specification was finalized. The mapping of SMALLINT and TINYINT
to Integer is maintained to preserve backwards compatibility
For more information see table B-3 in the JDBC4.0 spec.
Kris Jurka
