On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 02:50:53PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> This patch removes six lines of code and adds none. There are four
> messages on the thread. We've done 14 complete CI runs. That might be
> an extreme example, but I just don't know if repeatedly running CI on
> small patches that aren't being actively updated is really what we
> want to be doing.
Yes, starting with a low threshold should have little impact. I
suspect that we could take it slow, say by testing much less patches
that have a max of N lines touched (20~50?), and shave in resource
usage. This would not change much how useful the information provided
is.
--
Michael
