Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 02:50:53PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> This patch removes six lines of code and adds none. There are four
>> messages on the thread. We've done 14 complete CI runs. That might be
>> an extreme example, but I just don't know if repeatedly running CI on
>> small patches that aren't being actively updated is really what we
>> want to be doing.
> Yes, starting with a low threshold should have little impact. I
> suspect that we could take it slow, say by testing much less patches
> that have a max of N lines touched (20~50?), and shave in resource
> usage. This would not change much how useful the information provided
> is.
I think running a test promptly after a new patch submission is
useful, even for small patches. I agree that the periodic re-tests
for bit-rot could be scaled back a lot.
regards, tom lane
