Re: not quite a cross tab query... - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Greenwood
Subject Re: not quite a cross tab query...
Date
Msg-id ae9185aa0903051228q4646089ds9e8c09889cd58ff3@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: not quite a cross tab query...  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Richard Greenwood wrote:
>
>> Hello pgsql listers,
>>
>> I've got a problem that is similar to, but I don't think identical to,
>> a cross tab query. My data looks like:
>>  ID | CAT
>>  1  |   A
>>  1  |   B
>>  2  |   A
>>  2  |   C
>> So for each ID there may be many CAT (categories).
>> The client wants it to look like:
>>  ID | CATS
>>  1  |  A,B
>>  2  |  A,C
>> Where each ID is unique in the results, and the CAT values are
>> concatenated with a comma separator.
>>
>> There are about 100 unique CAT values. They only way I can see to do
>> it is programatically with a for loop. But before I do that I wanted
>> to bounce it off the fine minds that inhabit this list.
>
> Sounds like a job for array_accum(), which you can find mentioned
> at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/xaggr.html
>
> select id, array_to_string(array_accum(cat), ',') from table group by id;
>
> There'll be a built-in array_agg() in 8.4, I think.
>
> Cheers,
>  Steve

Thanks, that looks like what I need!

Regards,
Rich

--
Richard Greenwood
richard.greenwood@gmail.com
www.greenwoodmap.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Greenwood
Date:
Subject: Re: not quite a cross tab query...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BufferSync() performance