Re: Maximum xid increasing - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Maximum xid increasing
Date
Msg-id aceaaf7781a4fd8c7792f510efd6d7743a43fbdd.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Maximum xid increasing  (Craig Milhiser <craig@milhiser.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 09:09 -0500, Craig Milhiser wrote:
> Our max xid are over 500m and climbing. Auto vacuuming and manual vacuuming are returning
>
> autovacuuming to prevent wraparound.
> WARNING:  oldest xmin is far in the past
> HINT:  Close open transactions soon to avoid wraparound problems.
> You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions, or drop stale replication slots.
>
> The autovacuum previously kicked in at 200m and reduced the maximum xid.   Now there is no reduction.
>
> We have a writer (master) node, 3 readers (slaves) and a hot-standby. We have an ETL vendor hooked
> up to replicate. All of the replications are working. There is current data in each. We have checked
> our replication slots. Everything is in use and working.
>
> From transactions, we have terminated every writer node PID since before this climb has started.
> Almost every client has been restarted. 
>
> We are handling 100+ insert/updates per second. Most transactions complete in ~2 seconds. Though some
> may take 1 minute.  There are no long running idle in transaction activities. 
>
> We have been scouring the internet reading many helpful pages and trying their advice but we cannot
> find a problem.
>
> We have restored a daily snapshot in another cluster. After vacuuming the max xid dropped to 50m.
> No client was connected. Implying that a restart should fix the issue.
>
> I am searching for any hints. We have not found a smoking gun to focus on.  This is a 24x7 operation
> and would rather not have to restart the server.
>
> We are on v13.8, AWS RDS.
>
> Is there a way to find which row or table or lock or some open transaction is preventing the vacuuming
> from lowering xid? Any hints on where to look? 

If that is not a bug introduced by Amazon, and you are certain that there are no long-running
transactions and stale replication slots, there are two more possibilities:

1. a prepared transaction (check pg_prepared_xacts)

2. a long-running query on a standby, and "hot_standby_feedback = on"

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: No longer available installer for greater version then PostgreSQL 10
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Weirdness (bug?) with aggregates and subqueries