Re: doc: create table improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: doc: create table improvements
Date
Msg-id ab574da206f7cb0db340671d88eff4ae9d66e450.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc: create table improvements  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 07:41 -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I question whether “parameter” is even the correct class to assign here
> and so would rather avoid the issue by not assigning a class.

Right.  I have removed the vestiges from my failed attempt to improve
the "parameter" decorations.

> “If none is specified, the data will be persistent” would be better
> written “If unspecified the data will be persistent” (or, “if not specified…”)

I decided to use the trusted phrasing "by default".

> Everything else looks good.

Patch attached; if it is fine with you, I'll mark it "ready for committer".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with query_is_distinct_for() and grouping sets
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart