Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions
Date
Msg-id aab40650-d292-3ece-e398-af2da8888e08@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions
List pgsql-hackers
p 9/13/23 om 22:01 schreef David E. Wheeler:
> On Sep 13, 2023, at 01:11, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
>> "All use of json*() functions preclude index usage."
>>
>> That sentence is missing from the documentation.
> 
> Where did that come from? Why wouldn’t JSON* functions use indexes? I see that the docs only mention operators; why
wouldthe corresponding functions behave the same?
 
> 
> D

Sorry, perhaps my reply was a bit off-topic.
But you mentioned perhaps touching the docs and
the not-use-of-index is just so unexpected.
Compare these two statements:

select count(id) from movies where
movie @? '$ ? (@.year == 2023)'
Time: 1.259 ms
   (index used)

select count(id) from movies where
jsonb_path_match(movie, '$.year == 2023');
Time: 17.260 ms
   (no index used - unexpectedly slower)

With these two indexes available:
   using gin (movie);
   using gin (movie jsonb_path_ops);

(REL_15_STABLE; but it's the same in HEAD and
the not-yet-committed SQL/JSON patches.)

Erik Rijkers



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: CHECK Constraint Deferrable