Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date
Msg-id aa16d04bf822b16e593a2de09766fa256526946f.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 15:53 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Yeah, but it's annoying to have to start every talk I give touching
> this
> subject with the slide that says "When we say SSL we really means
> TLS".
> Maybe release 15 would be a good time to rename user-visible option
> names etc, with support for legacy names.

Sounds good to me, though I haven't looked into how big of a diff that
will be.

Also, do we have precedent for GUC aliases? That might be a little
weird.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Make unlogged table resets detectable
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments