On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:27:41PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I also agree with Chao's suggestion that the
> error message better reflects the actual character limits. I
> implemented a patch for that and updated the test patch as well.
> Please check.
The restriction related to the private area can be enlarged by 1 byte,
because we don't care about the null-termination in this case.
Done that, and adjusted the whole down to 17 where this has been
introduced. It's far from being critical, but consistency could
matter for future changes, including things outside of core. And it's
nice to keep the same rules across the board if we can do so for
testing facilities.
--
Michael
