Hi,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 9:37 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:27:41PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch. I also agree with Chao's suggestion that the
> > error message better reflects the actual character limits. I
> > implemented a patch for that and updated the test patch as well.
> > Please check.
>
> The restriction related to the private area can be enlarged by 1 byte,
> because we don't care about the null-termination in this case.
Makes sense to me.
> Done that, and adjusted the whole down to 17 where this has been
> introduced. It's far from being critical, but consistency could
> matter for future changes, including things outside of core. And it's
> nice to keep the same rules across the board if we can do so for
> testing facilities.
> --
> Michael
Thanks.
--
Best,
Xuneng