Hi Michael, Chao,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 11:32 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:30:31AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> > Is really confused. The error message says “maximum of 64”, but the
> > test right uses a name of length 64. I know that the tricky is the
> > ‘\0’ terminator, but should SQL writer have to keep mind about the
> > ‘\0’ terminator? Should they just consider maximum length as 63?
>
> Right. We could add a "- 1" to the error message printed.
Thanks for the patch. I also agree with Chao's suggestion that the
error message better reflects the actual character limits. I
implemented a patch for that and updated the test patch as well.
Please check.
Best,
Xuneng