Re: "openssl" should not be optional - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: "openssl" should not be optional
Date
Msg-id aNPX867RbttSeNkl@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "openssl" should not be optional  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: "openssl" should not be optional
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Daniel Gustafsson
> It seems a bit restrictive to require the openssl binary which is test-only,
> since we allow building with ssl but without TAP support (which is where the
> openssl binary is used).

Ok, but then the error messages should be better. This was found
because a fellow Debian developer was smart enough to spot the extra
space in that " x509" error message... (And another one knew about
this difference between the different build environments.)

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Next
From: Greg Burd
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset