Re: "openssl" should not be optional - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: "openssl" should not be optional
Date
Msg-id 52A12672-72CC-47FC-A0FA-DDFF7C23F2D2@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to "openssl" should not be optional  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
Responses Re: "openssl" should not be optional
List pgsql-hackers
> On 24 Sep 2025, at 13:14, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:

> While it is probably possible to skip the tests when the configure
> probe did not find the openssl binary, IMHO the configure check should
> already fail. That's more robust and easier.

It seems a bit restrictive to require the openssl binary which is test-only,
since we allow building with ssl but without TAP support (which is where the
openssl binary is used).

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint