Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count() - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From hubert depesz lubaczewski
Subject Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count()
Date
Msg-id aEreruE-8drtSsKt@depesz.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 09:54:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:03:25AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> >> I am trying to run the below query
> >> select REGEXP_COUNT('cat at the flat', '\Bat\b') ;
> >> I was expecting it to return 2 but I see Postgres is returning 0. I see that
> >> there are two matches, cat and flat. All it should do is to look for the
> >> word at whose left side shoudn't be a word boundary while the right side
> >> should be a word boundary
> 
> > What makes you think that \B/\b has anything to do with word boundary?
> 
> Indeed, they do not.
> 
> > As far as I can tell pg regexps have nothing related to word boundaries.
> 
> Sure we do, see "Regular Expression Constraint Escapes":
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-matching.html#POSIX-CONSTRAINT-ESCAPES-TABLE
> 
> Unfortunately, since these are all way outside the POSIX regexp
> standard, different systems have implemented these extensions
> differently.  I don't doubt that \B/\b mean word boundaries
> in some other system.

Oh, Missed that. Thanks.

So the regexp can be rewritten to:

=$ select REGEXP_COUNT('cat at the flat', '\Yat\M');
 regexp_count
──────────────
            2
(1 row)

Best regards,

depesz




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18956: Observing an issue in regexp_count()
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18952: pg_restore --help and document have strange description: Dump something