On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 11:41:49AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I brought this up with the RMT, and everyone seemed okay with committing it
> for v18.
Cool, thanks for the update.
> I can move it back to replorigin_create(). I don't have a strong opinion
> here.
I think that I would the check there, as that's safer in the long-run
to enforce the rule to all potential callers of this API. If the
votes balance in favor of keeping it in the SQL function, that's OK by
me as well, so feel free to ignore me if you feel strongly about it
overall.
--
Michael
