Hi,
On 2018/10/15 19:04, Krzysztof Nienartowicz wrote:
>
> We see quite prohibitive 5-6x slowdown with native partitioning on in
> comparison to trigger based in PG9.5.
> This is clearly visible with highly parallel inserts (Can share
> flamediagrams comparing the two).
>
> This basically excludes native partitioning from being used by us. Do you
> think your changes could be backported to PG10? - we checked and this would
> need quite a number of changes but given the weight of this change maybe it
> could be considered?
It's unfortunate that PG 10's partitioning cannot be used for your use
case, but I don't think such a major refactoring will be back-ported to 10
or 11. :-(
Thanks,
Amit
